After reading the McCloud comics, I found that even as a
parent, my two girls do the same thing when I ask them to tell me about a toy.
I never really thought about how in their minds, they just run through the
actions of what the toy does, and they don’t really think to tell about it. “It’s
a cool toy that does stuff, duh!” Weird how in our society it does consider it
normal to do things as kids, but you need to outgrow them as an adult. I see
the parallelism with this as education ruining creativity.
If everyone ‘outgrew’ this technique, where would movies,
comics, children books, graphic novels, video games, etc… come from? What does
this say about people who regularly read the political comics? Or people who
spend their life and education on translating hieroglyphs? Funny how it works
that the comic talks about this ideology, then there is a huge metaphorically BUT,
when commercialism comes into play. “We need these child-like ways of thinking
to go away, BUT, when there is millions to be made….we will make exceptions.” I
had to laugh at the scene where the ‘narrator’ is talking about how modern art
became incomprehensible to the average viewer!! “I know the artist is making a
statement, but I don’t know what the heck it is.”
How many times has anyone told another person, “I read this
awesome book and it said this...”? Much like the part 2 of McCloud (page 25) we
use words to describe things that aren’t really true. I have to correct myself all
the time over that little detail. No biggie, because people tend to let it go,
but it really depends on the type of writing or talking you are doing. You have
got to know your audience.
I never looked at random objects the way McCloud describes.
We want to see ourselves in everything we buy. It makes sense though, when
selling a house (have done it twice) you want to remove any trace of your
family. You want the prospective buyer to see themselves in the house raising
their family. Same with cars, remove all stickers and such you might have put
on it. Remove all personality to it. I think the parmesan cheese lid, might be
going overboard though.
The A/V projects: I found it interesting to see what
different path we took in creating our videos. I guess that’s what makes them unique;
we all have different views of the world around us. I’m pretty sure my video
would have been much different if I was single without little ones running
around.
Hyper-Readers was interesting, in the sense that I had read
some of the ideas before, just not in the detail as the author puts them. I
have dealt with other classes in which a classmate has ‘trespassed’ and taking
snippets of material and put in their own writing. Luckily I was able to catch
it, and remind them to cite the source. What I also found interesting was; the
material being quoted was being used to defend the author’s claim, when in
reality, the information was going against their claim. If the classmate would
have actually read the whole article versus ‘skimming’ over it, she would have
picked up on that.
I think it's interesting how McCloud shows the abstract evolution of pictures into symbols and language. Symbols and language creates pictures in our minds. I don't know, I guess that pictures seem to aid our comprehension of something, but it can also ruin our imagination. Say I read a book and then some artist published their interpretation of the villain of the book and it was totally different from my visualization. I would be kind of pissed.
ReplyDeleteI guess it comes down to audience, like you said, and maybe a bit of agenda - do I want to leave my words open to interpretation? Would a picture here help create meaning and steer the reader toward my interpretation?
I liked the discussion of the "collision" (149) of words and pictures. I think it's worth asking why we so blindly believe advertising (always combining pictures and text) but shy away from treating texts like comic books as silly texts for children. Perhaps it is that connection to show and tell that we perceive as child's play. But why do teachers find value in doing these exercises? Could it be that it develops our minds? If so, why stop at childhood?
Do you think that there must be compartmentalized genres? Another thing is that I noticed that "adult" comics seem to be less real than the child's. Juts thinking on book illustrations. And thinking that business books, graphs, etc. are actually really abstract.
ReplyDeleteI truly think that we have specialized genres within genres. Years ago, I went into a comic book store just to see what it looked like. I worked at the public library in Boise, Id, so I was familiar with they standard genres, but I was blown away that even with the 'comic book' genre, there are so many specific genres within that.
DeleteI agree with you about how adult comics are less real than kids comics, yet supposedly it shoudln't be that way (technically adults shouldn't read comics anyways). Maybe as adults we are just so sick of all the b.s. that goes around us, that we just want to enjoy something that is totally fake (along the same sense of watching a movie).
As far as the business books, again I agree. Unless you know what your doing, those books are confusing.
Maybe comics are the sub-genre for adults that never grow-up but do a real good job of acting like it from 9-5pm?
ReplyDelete